Friday, 12 April 2019

Analytical /Critical Reflection

It has finally come to the end of the trimester and it is about time to wrap up this effective communication module. The activities and assignments that were given during the lessons were helpful in providing me with the tools needed to improve my writing and presentation skills. At the start of the module, I set myself with two goals. The goals were to improve the way I write and to improve my presentation skills. I am glad to have been able to achieve these personal goals of mine. However, I do realise that this module has been structured in a way to briefly introduce the different communication skills and the rushed trimester curriculum does not allow for a more in-depth look of the different types of communication methods.  Therefore, I realise that the content we learn during this module is for us to continue to use, learn and explore even after we are done with this trimester. On a personal level, I do feel that what we learn in the effective communication module is an extremely important skill to be used in school and especially in the working world.

The main highlight of this whole module would definitely be the report writing. It was a pleasure to have worked with my fellow teammates. Each of them has their own strengths and weaknesses and it all compliments one another. The way our team worked was to divide the different research topics individually and then come together to compile the various research topics together. I was the one who compiled everything and did the amendments to ensure the report had a smooth flow. We agreed this was the most suitable working style due to our busy schedules.

This method of working was a rather new experience for me. Honestly, throughout the trimester, the only time the group met for discussion was during lesson time. The only time we met outside of lesson time was a week prior to the submission of the report.  This was unavoidable as we all had a hectic school schedule. Having said that, to make up for our lack of physical meet-ups, there had to be a coordinator, which was me, to delegate the different tasks for each team member to complete by a stipulated dateline. I am happy that my teammates are good team players and we completed the report without any problems. From this, I learn that having good communication with other people is equally as important as having good writing skills. I would definitely remember this when I enter the working world.

Another highlight of the module would be the presentation showcase. It was enjoyable to be able to see our fellow course mates take the stage and present their creative ideas to the whole course. Although my team did not make it to this stage, we did have a fruitful experience watching the different teams present. Personally, perhaps due to my biasness, I feel that the team ‘energy savers’ was the best as they did a splendid job in engaging the audience. The ‘starfish’ opening by Nurul was great as it really pulled in the attention of the audience to the topic of their presentation. Their presentation slides were also clear and concise, and I felt engaged throughout their whole presentation. Overall, it was a good experience,

Thinking back, I am certain that this module has been a fruitful experience. I'd like to thank Mr Blackstone for his guidance throughout the entire trimester and to all my peers for making the classes absolutely engaging. 

Signing out for the last time,
Alfian

ADIOS AMIGOS

Team PV SCOOTERS SDN BHD with Mr Blackstone

CVE group 4 2018/2019

Commented on Lu Sheng, Jordon and Aufal

Finalised technical report

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Dr Jawn Lim
SIT Punggol Planning Committee
Singapore Institute of Technology
10 Dover Drive
Singapore 138683

Dear Dr Lim,
Re: Proposal for the implementation of solar powered electric scooter pilot project system in SIT Punggol

This report is produced for your consideration in response to the request for developing a solution to an engineering problem. This proposal has been produced with the objective of implementing a solar powered electric scooter pilot project in SIT Punggol. The implementation of the solar powered electric scooters pilot project system is environmentally friendly and serves as a platform to improve accessibility and mobility within the campus. It also serves as an educational tool for future developments.
Enclosed within this report is the identified problem, the background and planning procedure of the solar powered electric scooter pilot project system, benefits of the proposed system, the evaluation of the system and a case study of an existing system in NUS.
As Singapore strives to be more sustainable and environmentally friendly, the proposal also increases accessibility and mobility for the staff and students in the campus itself. Moreover, the pilot project serves as an educational tool for the future development of this system.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please direct any questions to 1801031@sit.singaporetech.edu.sg.

Your sincerely,
Alfian Arjuna
On behalf of PV Scooter
Civil Engineering Programme
Singapore Institute of Technology


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


This report has been developed in response to the request to develop a solution for an engineering problem. Mobility and accessibility within a university campus is always an important factor to any undergraduate. With the upcoming Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) located at Punggol set to be completed by 2023 (Cheng, 2018), the team proposes the implementation of a solar powered electric scooter sharing system (SPESS).

Through an interview with Dr Jawn Lim, a member of the SIT Punggol planning committee, the team has found out that the new campus of SIT Punggol will be approximately 25 hectares and has no existing plans for an on-campus transportation system such as a shuttle bus service. As a result, moving around the campus would take a considerable amount of time.

The implementation of the solar powered scooter system will improve the travelling time taken to all parts of the campus for the students and staff members of SIT. After a careful evaluation of a case study from an existing e-scooter sharing system in NUS, which relies on the power grid, the team produced this report with the intention to improve that system by using solar energy as a sustainable source of energy. 

TECHNICAL REPORT

1.0 Introduction

 1.1 Background Information

This report has been developed in response to the request for a proposal to develop a solution for engineering problems.


As Singapore strives to be more urbanized and sustainable, there have been great efforts to promote public transportation due to its increasing population. The “Walk, Cycle, Ride” was launched by Land Transport Authority (Land Transport Authority, n.d.) to enhance Singapore’s transportation system further to have a “travel car-lite” society. The Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy has addressed the importance of seamless mobility as shown in Figure 1. 
Figure 1. Seamless mobility, future of mobility (Lee Kuan Yew School of public policy, 2017)



LTA conducted a survey to monitor the commuting patterns of Singaporeans and the result showed that 70% of the commuters engaged in the “walk, cycle and ride” prior to using the public transportation system (Lim, 2018). E-scooters is one form of transport that commuters can use before they use public transportation. E-scooter is an environmentally friendly, portable and a convenient mode of transport and effective for quick journeys (Cheong, 2017). The pavements in most parts of Singapore provides an easy connection for better accessibility. A 30% growth in sale of e-scooters was reported after the introduction of LTA’s code of conduct called the Active Mobility Act was implemented (Mobot, 2018). This shows the reliance of e-scooters and it will be expected to increase in the many years to come.

According to NUS News (2018), to better understand the behaviour of people when using a personal mobility device (PMD) such as an e-scooter, the National University of Singapore has collaborated with Grabwheels for a e-scooter sharing system on campus. This e-scooter sharing system has shown to improve the travelling time taken to every part of the campus for the students and staff members of NUS.

The e-scooters are ready to serve students and staff members at assigned strategic locations on the NUS campus. To activate and deactivate the e-scooter, they are required to scan the QR code through an app designed by Grab. The battery life of the e-scooter has a capacity of up to one day, and it must be taken away to be recharged every evening and transported back to the parking stations for use the next day. This e-scooter sharing system is in line with Singapore’s transformation to travel “car-lite” and to be environmentally friendly (Cheong, 2017).

The relevance of this e-scooter sharing system located at NUS could be implemented to the new campus of SIT Punggol. From an interview the team conducted with Dr Jawn Lim from the SIT Punggol planning committee, the team has discovered that the size of the new SIT campus would be approximately 25 hectares. According to him, there are no such plans for an on-campus transportation system such as shuttle buses or shared personal mobility device service. As a result, SIT students and staff members would have to walk around the whole campus on foot, with the longest stretch of walkway being 1 kilometre long, taking a considerable amount of time.

To better understand the needs of students and staff members at SIT in terms of mobility within the new university campus, the team surveyed 30 current students from SIT@Dover. The results show that 80% of them find that accessibility and mobility within the new university campus compound to be vital. A solution must be developed to help tackle the issue of accessibility and mobility within the new SIT Punggol campus. 




Figure 2. The Punggol Digital District (Asiaone, 2018)



SIT Punggol campus will be located at the Punggol Digital District under the land ownership of Jurong Town Corporation (JTC) of 50 hectares. There will be Personal Mobility Device (PMD) friendly pavements to encourage the campus to be car-lite and environmentally friendly (URA, 2018). This allows the community the opportunity to be more connected and have an easier access to their destinations.

As the developer JTC has plans for a PMD friendly pavement at the Punggol digital district, which includes SIT campus itself, the implementation of this solar powered e-scooter is very relevant. A student will take a considerable amount of time to get from one point on campus to another point on campus. Ideally, it is vital to have good mobility within the campus itself to improve the accessibility of the students.


1.2 Problem statement

A self-sustaining SPESS would be ideal in the SIT Punggol campus to better facilitate the movement of students and staff members. From the interview with Dr Jawn Lim, there are no proposed systems to be used in SIT Punggol. Such a system would ideally serve the needs of the students and staff members of SIT Punggol in terms of mobility, environmental sustainability and serving as an educational tool for future research.


1.3 Purpose statement

The purpose of this report is to propose to the planning committee of SIT Punggol the implementation of SPESS within the vicinity of SIT Punggol. The team also aims to highlight that the proposal is environmentally sustainable, provides better mobility for students and serves as an educational purpose to the community.

2.0 Proposed solutions

An e-scooter is a stand-up motorised mobility device using a small built in battery. These are rechargeable batteries which requires charging from conventional power plugs. The batteries will then supply power to operate the e-scooter. The difference between a solar powered e-scooter and an ordinary e-scooter is that it uses solar energy to charge the battery.

The team has conducted thorough research and has concluded that there is currently no usage of solar-powered e-scooter in Singapore. Therefore, the team proposes a solar-powered e-scooter sharing system pilot project to be implemented at the new campus.

The e-scooters would aid in mobility and improve the connectivity within the campus. The overall goal of this sharing system would be to provide better accessibility for all SIT staff members and students around campus in a clean and sustainable way.

The team will further elaborate on the planning procedures taken into consideration for this sharing system.


Figure 3. Solar powered electric scooter (Oddity, 2015)

2.1 Mechanism


The scooter will consist of a handle bar, a standing platform and two wheels. Solar panels will be encased on the large deck where the rider stands.

2.2 Solar power as an energy source


Solar power is a renewable energy that generates zero carbon emissions and helps environmental sustainability (EMA, n.d). Photovoltaic cells will be installed onto the e-scooters which convert sunlight into electricity to charge the battery in the e-scooter. This shows the efficiency of having a stand-alone solar power which can reduce its costs for electricity, being self-reliant and requires minimum maintenance.


Figure 4. Solar Battery Charger for Motorcycle Solar Panels (Autospost,2016)

2.3 Integration with public transportation


As LTA continues to strive to improve connectivity, speed and convenience for commuters from home to destination (LTA, 2013) the implementation of solar powered e-scooters within the campus would help in LTA’s vision for better connectivity. The implementation of this e-scooter sharing system would potentially solve the first-and-last-mile issue related to public transit access.

2.4 SIT mobile application


With the SIT app, users will be able to locate the nearest e-scooter available, nearest parking spaces and the fastest route to the destination. The app will also be used to unlock the e-scooter by scanning the QR codes attached on the handlebar. Once the ride has ended, users can also pay for the trip via the app.

2.5 Routes


Pathway in addition to the existing footpaths to cater for bicycles and personal mobility devices. One example will be like the shared path adopted by LTA which creates a save environment for both pedestrians and riders. 

Figure 5. Shared cycling paths in Ang Mo Kio. (Channel Newsasia, 2016)





2.6 Parking spaces


To ensure the ease of usage of e-scooters, parking spaces will be allocated outside the MRT station and certain bus stops around campus. Various parking spaces will also be allocated evenly around the campus. This would ensure that users will have a complete journey to school.

2.7 Rules and regulations


Rules and regulations will be in place and made known to all users. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary actions by the school.

3.0 Benefits


The benefits that we could gain from the proposed solution is a reduction of the travelling time taken by staff and students, a reduction on expenses by the school, an increase in economic activity and a decrease of vehicles on the campus roads.

3.1 Reduction in travelling time

With the incorporation of the e-scooter system to the upcoming SIT@Punggol campus, it would mean that the travelling time taken for SIT users would be significantly reduced. With the reduction on travelling time, student would be better able to optimise their time wisely.

 

3.2 Better connectivity

Connectivity within campus is important for any university. With the introduction of this e-scooter system, students and staff would be more connected and would be able to travel to further parts of the campus with ease. As the e-scooter also supplements the public transportation system, it would mean that that users are able to reach locations on campus that are considered far by foot.

3.3 Reduction on expense

With the implementation of the e-scooters that are powered by solar energy, this would mean that SIT Punggol would be able to utilize the money that is otherwise used to pay for a conventional electric powered e-scooter. With the money that is saved, SIT could potentially use the funds to be used to further the vision of sustainability within campus itself. SIT could install solar panels around the campus to power streetlights or infrastructure around the campus itself.

 3.4 Increased economic activity

With the increased mobility and accessibility of students and staff, there would be more opportunities for them to engage in economic activities on campus. Shopping and eating at locations around campus would be increased as people are mobile. Places such as MRT Station and economic hubs such as shopping plazas on campus would also see an increase in customers.

3.5 Reduction in cars on campus

The implementation of e-scooters would reduce the reliance of cars on campus promoting environmental sustainability. Due to the ease of mobility available on campus, staff and students would forego personal transport such as cars in favour of public transport and e-scooters to move around campus.

4.0 Evaluation


The proposed solution of implementing a SPESS at SIT Punggol to improve accessibility and mobility is doable as our project will be in line with the JTC master plan of Punggol Digital District. As JTC already has plans to incorporate a Personal Mobility Device (PMD) friendly pavements to travel car-lite, this proposal would be relevant to tackle the issue of mobility and accessibility of students within the university campus. The SPESS will reduce the reliance on the power grid, saving money in the long run.

As there has never been a trial run of a SPESS of any kind in Singapore, the recommended plan of action to gauge the effectiveness of this system is to look at the current system being used in NUS. As mentioned earlier in the report, the system e-scooter used in NUS has shown to improve the time taken to travel from one point to another. However, the e-scooters in NUS has a problem where it must be regularly collected for the batteries to be recharged. From this, the team’s proposal of the SPESS is relevant as charging through solar power would eliminate this problem altogether. 

4.1 Challenges


Since there are regulations on the size and weight for e-scooter in Singapore, incorporating PV cells into e-scooters might increase its weight. With the additional load of solar panels onto the e-scooter, it might not meet LTA regulations requirements.

According to LTA’s guidelines, an electric scooter shall not weight 20kg (Land Transport Authority, 2018). Therefore, the total weight of an e-scooter together with an incorporated PV cell shall not exceed 20kg.

Therefore, certain comparisons such as which model, weight and cost of the scooters must be considered for it to be allowed to be used.

Brand
Weight (kg)
Cost ($)
XiaoMi Mijia M365

12.5
499
Dyu Seated E-Scooter
12
549 to 889
Inokim mini plus
8.7
629
(Lim, 2019)
From the table above, it shows the comparison between the weight and cost of three brands of scooters.

With the average weight of a PV cell to be 10 kilogramme per square metre (Simone, 2013), a 60cm by 50cm PV cell attached to the escooters would only weigh an additional 4 kilogramme. All three scooters above would meet LTA’s requirements.

5.0 Methodology

5.1 Primary research

5.1.1 Online Survey

The primary research was an online survey questionnaire conducted by dissemination of a google form link to 30 current SIT students located in different campus via WhatsApp Mobile application. Current SIT students were chosen as the survey participants as they would spend the most amount of time travelling around the campus. The objective of the survey is to find out more about the opinions of SIT students on having a e-scooter sharing system in the new SIT@Punggol campus.


From the results of the survey, 99% of the respondent were keen on having a e-scooter sharing system in the new SIT@Punggol campus and 98.5% believe that the e-scooter sharing system will be of a great aid to reduce travelling time on campus. The survey results support the team’s proposal and shows the high demand for a e-scooter sharing system in the new SIT Punggol campus.

5.1.2 Interview

The team also has an interview with a member of the planning committee of SIT Punggol, Dr Jawn Lim.
From the interview, the team found out that:

i)                 There are currently no plans on having an e-scooter sharing system in the new campus.
ii)                The size of the campus would be 25 hectares
iii)              There are no plans for a transportation system with the campus
iv)              The furthest distance a student could within the campus would be 1km from one end to another

The results of the survey questionnaire and the transcript between the team and Dr Lim would be attached in the appendices.

5.2 Secondary research


Secondary research was conducted by the team to understand the relevance of the problem and to aid in the formation of the proposed solutions.

The areas of research the team conducted were mainly:
i)                 Conducted on Government websites such as LTA and URA for guidelines and schemes
ii)                Conducted on websites relating to the case study of grabwheels and NUS to establish a e-scooter sharing system on campus to understand the inner workings of a similar e-scooter sharing system in Singapore.
iii)              Conducted on various websites pertaining to the SIT campus and the JTC digital district.
iv)              Conducted on websites for the research on PV solar cells and e-scooters

Refer to the reference page for details of the information gathered.

6.0 Conclusion

With SIT Punggol still in the planning stage, the implementation of this proposal would enhance the university campus. Not only does it reduce the amount of time from one point to another, it improves connectivity and accessibility within the campus itself. With the implementation of the SPESS, businesses within the campus would flourish due to the increased mobility of students and staff within the campus itself. The use of the scooters as a means of transport within the university would lead to a carlite campus.

The sustainable use of solar power as a means to power the scooters would mean that the school would only have to bear the cost of the initial start up and maintenance of the system, unlike the conventional scooter systems which takes energy from the power grid. This plus point would save costs, which can be used for other areas in the school.

This proposal is relevant because it is in line with LTA’s vision of a more connected society, by using a device that is environmentally sustainable. This system, if implemented, would launch Singapore to a bright future. A city that integrates development with sustainability and would be an example to the rest of the world.

Tuesday, 2 April 2019

Mapletree Challenge reflection


The Mapletree forum was a unique experience as it shows me a broader perspective of sustainability faced by the industry leaders. The invited panellists are at the forefront of the innovative change and thrives in the industry.

This forum has made realise that the road to success would require a proper mindset and the ability to overcome any obstacles that come in our way. Having said that, as a young undergraduate, there are still many things to learn and many more mistakes that we would make before we can ever aspire to be like the panellists on stage. The knowledge they possess and their success stories have been possible after countless times of failure and only from these failures will learning be made possible.

The tips given by the panellists have inspired me to reconciliate the future of entrepreneurship. On a personal level, it is a daunting thing, as this would require me to step into the unknown. However, after listening to what all the panellist has to say, I am confident to say that I would consider giving it a try. Afterall, the path to success is a long and tough journey, and failure is bound to happen.

Eugene, one of the panellist mentioned that having a product that has an appeal to an intended audience and the support of the government is important for young entrepreneurs. I think that this is an important step to think about when starting out.


This forum has inspired me to rethink my goal in my university life, whether I should just complete my degree, or perhaps try to explore the possibility of entrepreneurship. This would require connections and the will to try new things. I am certain that this path would lead me to a brighter future, with the chance to spark a positive change in the industry. 


Commented on

-Baizurah
-Akram
-Domenic

Saturday, 16 February 2019

Annotated Summary Draft 1

Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Zohdy, I. (2016). Shared Mobility: Current Practices and Guiding Principles (FHWA-HOP-16-022) Retrieved from https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop16022/fhwahop16022.pdf


This article focuses on shared mobility. It explains the term shared mobility which is the act of sharing a vehicle, typically a car or bicycle, based on an individual’s needs at their own convenience. Vehicles are usually parked en masse at locations with high human flow. It is then facilitated by communication technology, such as mobile applications to aid in the vehicle rental. Typically, the vehicle-sharing operator will incur the cost of maintenance, storage, parking and insurance. There are several benefits that come from vehicle sharing. For environmental benefits, there was a reduction in vehicle use, car ownership and distance travelled by vehicles. Saving of cost and reliability of shared mobility are the main reason for the shift to shared mobility. The second benefit would be accessibility. Shared mobility supplements existing transportation networks as users would be able to access places that were previously harder to reach. This aids in the accessibility of public transport. Lastly, for economic benefits, shared mobility would result in an increased economic activity near public hubs such as bus or train stations. Shared mobility is still at an early stage and has room for improvement. For shared mobility to be successful, it is vital for the local government to intervene. Factors such as safety, taxation, insurance, parking, access to rights-of-way and planning processes must be considered by the local government. The main aim of this article is to introduce the concept of shared mobility and to show the importance of government intervention in incorporating shared mobility into transportation planning. 

Friday, 15 February 2019

Summary_Reader response draft 3

In the article, "Green buildings, Singapore's natural ally for a greener future", MacKenzie (2017) states that green building design is a way to fight climate change. The author claims that Singapore’s economic success over many years has resulted in a sharp increase of buildings being built. This contributes to a quarter of the carbon emission produced by Singapore. To combat this issue of climate change, the Building construction authority (BCA) aims to have at least 80% of buildings to be Green Mark certified by the year 2030 and to educate people about the consequence of climate change. In fact, some buildings have already started going green. For example, Parkroyal has features that make it energy efficient. A building with green building designs should consist of light colours, make use of natural lighting, optimize technology and utilize an element that emphasizes on sustainability. Mackenzie (2017) states that Asia Square is a prime example of this. It consumes 35% less energy and is one of the most efficient buildings in Singapore, as it combines design and sustainability. This shows that having a green building design is not expensive and is the way forward.
__________________________________________________________________
While MacKenzie’s summary states the features of green building and its benefits, it fails to mention the steps taken by the governments to entice developers to adopt green building. Two ways the government could entice developers to adopt green building are to introduce monetary incentives and to provide a system which aids in the implementation of green building design.
The first method is for the government to entice entities through monetary incentives. Singapore is a good example of how the government attracts green building design to developers and businesses. In the article, “Why green real estate is the way forward” Ang (2017) states that the government of Singapore offers developers benefits for buildings that adopt green building features. The government rewards developers with an extension of 2 percent Gross Floor Area when they adopt green building features. As for existing buildings, BCA will absorb 50 percent to the implementation cost of the green building features. As for businesses, the government enforces green building design by only leasing out office spaces that are certified with a Green Mark Gold Plus. This shows that the government provides rewards for developers to adopt green building design which is a win-win for developers.

The second method is for the government to provide developers with a system which aids in the facilitation and implementation of green building. India is one such example. It already has a system in place which would help developers implement green building design.  From the article, “Going Green: The way forward” The Economic Times (2008), the Indian Green Building Council (IGBC) plays a vital role in the green building initiatives. These initiatives are supported by the Indian government Indian Green Building Council (2015). It implements a complex system called the Integrated Building Management System (IBMS) which is much like a ‘nerve centre’. It controls anything that consumes power, to reduce the consumption of energy throughout the entire building. In the long run, it is an economical system for developers or businesses to have. Unlike Singapore, which gives direct incentives for the adoption of green building features, the Indian Government provides entities with the system which provides an open door for the transition to green building design.
In conclusion, it is the ease of transition for entities to adopt green building design and its economic benefits they would gain from it, that is the number one pull factor that governments would have to come up with, to push their countries towards green building design.
(604 words)

Ang, K. S. (2017, January). Why green real estate is the way forward. Retrieved from JLL Real Views website: https://www.jllrealviews.com/

The Economic Times (2008, May). Going Green: The way forward. Retrieved from The Economic Times website: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/going-green-the-way-forward/articleshow/3040667.cms


Indian green building council (2015). Retrieved from Indian Green building Council website: https://igbc.in/igbc/redirectHtml.htm?redVal=showAboutusnosign

Monday, 11 February 2019

Summary_Reader response draft 2

In the article, "Green buildings, Singapore's natural ally for a greener future", MacKenzie (2017) states that green building design is a way to fight climate change. The author claims that Singapore’s economic success over many years has resulted in a sharp increase of buildings being built. This contributes to a quarter of the carbon emission produced by Singapore. To combat this issue of climate change, BCA aims to have at least 80% of buildings to be Green Mark certified by the year 2030 and to educate people about the consequence of climate change. In fact, some buildings have already started going green. For example, PARKROYAL has features that make it energy efficient. For a building with green building designs, it should consist of light colours, makes use of natural lighting, optimize technology, utilizing an element that emphasizes sustainability and lastly, liaising with the stakeholders. Asia Square is a prime example of this. It consumes 35% less energy and is one of the most efficient buildings in Singapore, as it combines design and sustainability. This shows that having a green building design is not expensive and is the way forward.
__________________________________________________________________
While the summary provides clear details on the positive impacts and details of green buildings, it fails to mention why developers would adopt green building. It is an undeniable fact that buildings are a major contributor to the carbon emission in the worlds. However, it is essential that the government would have to entice entities to adopt green building.  Singapore is a good example of how the government attracts green building design to developers and businesses. In the article, “Why green real estate is the way forward” (Ang, 2017) states that the government of Singapore offers developers benefits for buildings that adopt green building features. The government rewards developers with an extension of 2 percent Gross Floor Area when they adopt green building features. As for existing buildings, BCA will absorb 50 percent to the implementation cost of the green building features. As for businesses, the government enforces green building design by only leasing out office spaces that are certified with a Green Mark Gold Plus. This shows that the government provides an open door for the transition to the adoption of green building design.

India also places heavy emphasis on green building and is leading in the pursuit of green building design. In the article, “Green Buildings: Way forward in reducing emissions from buildings”, (Pundir.A, 2016) states that it is the Indian government’s priority to shift its focus to ‘sustainability of habitats’ through improving the energy consumption of its buildings. This shows that India is committed to green building.

India already has a system in place with the backing of the Indian government which would help in the country’s pursuit to implement green building design.  From the article, “Going Green: The way forward” (The Economic Times, 2008), the Indian Green Building Council (IGBC) plays a vital role in the green building initiatives. These initiatives are supported by the Indian government (Indian Green Building Council, 2015). It implements a complex system called the Integrated Building Management System (IBMS) which is much like a ‘nerve centre’. It controls anything that consumes power, to reduce the consumption of energy throughout the entire building. In the long run, it is an economical system for developers or businesses to have. Unlike Singapore, which gives direct incentives for the adoption of green building features, the Indian Government provides entities with the system which aids in the facilitation and implementation of green building.

In conclusion, I believe that it is the ease of transition for entities to adopt green building design and its economic benefits they would gain from it, that is the number one pull factor that governments would have to come up with, to push their countries towards green building design.


References
Ang, K. S. (2017, January). Why green real estate is the way forward. Retrieved from JLL Real Views website: https://www.jllrealviews.com/

Pundir,A (2016). Green buildings: Way forward in reducing emissions from buildings. Retrieved from Climate CoLab website: https://www.climatecolab.org/contests/2016/buildings/c/proposal/1321702


The Economic Times (2008, May). Going Green: The way forward. Retrieved from The Economic Times website: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/going-green-the-way-forward/articleshow/3040667.cms


Indian green building council (2015). Retrieved from Indian Green building Council website: https://igbc.in/igbc/redirectHtml.htm?redVal=showAboutusnosign

Thursday, 31 January 2019

Summary_Reader Response Draft 1

In the article, "Green buildings, Singapore's natural ally for a greener future", MacKenzie (2017) states that green building design is a way to fight climate change. The author claims that Singapore’s economic success over the many years has resulted in a sharp increase of buildings being built. This contributes to a quarter of the carbon emission produced by Singapore. To combat this issue of climate change, BCA aims to have at least 80% of buildings to be Green Mark certified by the year 2030 and to educate people about the consequence of climate change. In fact, some buildings have already started going green. For example, PARKROYAL has features that make it energy efficient. For a building with green building designs, it should consist of light colours, makes use of natural lighting, optimize technology, utilizing an element that emphasizes sustainability and lastly, liaising with the stakeholders. Asia Square is a prime example of this. It consumes 35% less energy and is one of the most efficient buildings in Singapore, as it combines design and sustainability. This shows that having a green building design is not expensive and is the way forward.
__________________________________________________________________
While the summary provides clear details on the positive impacts and details of green buildings, it fails to mention why developers would adopt green building.

It is an undeniable fact that buildings are a major contributor to the carbon emission in the worlds. However, it is essential that the government would have to entice entities to adopt green building.  Singapore is a good example of how the government attracts green building design to developers and businesses. In the article, “Why green real estate is the way forward”, Ang (2017) states that the government of Singapore offers developers benefits for buildings that adopt green building features. The government rewards developers with an extension of 2 percent Gross Floor Area when they adopt green building features. As for existing buildings, BCA will absorb 50 percent to the implementation cost of the green building features. As for businesses, the government enforces green building design by only leasing out office spaces that are certified with a Green Mark Gold Plus. This shows that the government provides an open door for the transition to the adoption of green building design.

India also places heavy emphasis on green building and is leading in the pursuit of green building design. In the article, “Green Buildings: Way forward in reducing emissions from buildings”, TCRP (2016) states that it is the Indian government’s priority to shift its focus to ‘sustainability of habitats’ through improving the energy consumption of its buildings.

India already has a system in place with the backing of the Indian government which would help in the country’s pursuit to implement green building design. According to, “Going Green: The way forward” The Economic Times (2008), it claims that [*the Indian Green Building Council (IGBC), which works closely with the Indian government*], plays a vital role in the green building initiative. It implements a complex system called the Integrated Building Management System (IBMS) which is much like a ‘nerve centre’. It controls anything that consumes power, to reduce the consumption of energy throughout the entire building. In the long run, it is an economical system for developers or businesses to have. Unlike Singapore, which gives direct incentives for the adoption of green building features, India provides entities with the system which aids in the facilitation and implementation of green building.

In conclusion, I believe that it is the ease of transition for entities to adopt green building design and its economic benefits they would gain from it, that is the number one pull factor that governments would have to come up with, to push their countries towards green building design.


References

Ang, K. S. (2017, January). Why green real estate is the way forward. Retrieved from JLL Real Views website: https://www.jllrealviews.com/

TCRP (2016). Green buildings: Way forward in reducing emissions from buildings. Retrieved from Climate CoLab website: https://www.climatecolab.org/contests/2016/buildings/c/proposal/1321702


TNN (2008, May). Going Green: The way forward. Retrieved from The Economic Times website: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/going-green-the-way-forward/articleshow/3040667.cms

Edited: 6/2/2019